Form as History: When History No Longer Requires Us offers a concise yet profound critique of contemporary historical thought. It argues that while modern scholarship has rendered Muslim life increasingly legible as a site of ethics, resistance, and normativity, this progress often masks a deeper, more unsettling possibility: that history itself has learned to proceed without requiring meaning, address, or human obligation.

The pamphlet centers on a crucial tension. On one side is the European figure of the Muselmann (from Holocaust testimony), who embodies history’s capacity to continue efficiently while ceasing to demand anything from the humans it governs—a state of abandonment, not mere loss. On the other side is the Muslim, positioned in modern discourse as a knowable subject of history. The book argues that emphasizing the latter’s agency can function as a displacement, allowing the radical threat of the Muselmann—history’s indifference—to be misrecognized as a cultural or religious attribute.

Refusing both nostalgia and moralizing, the text examines how forms of life—particularly historical Muslim commercial and legal practices—have sustained obligation and necessity even after political protagonism faded. Its aim is diagnostic: to make visible the quiet threshold where life is managed rather than addressed, and to clarify how historical necessity depends not on power or visibility, but on the persistence of forms that compel the world to answer.